Lead counsel to general contractor involving multi-million dollar allegations of lost inventory and personal injury claims stemming from industrial accident in North Carolina arising during course of construction.

The claims arose at a $70 million distribution warehouse in North Carolina. Dispute involved general liability carrier for general contractor and general liability carrier for numerous subcontractors. Assisted general contractor in settling claim and recovering in majority of settlement amount from clients’ insurance carriers and from third-party insurers. 

Represented insured general contractor in connection with coverage for design allegations made in connection with claims of faulty construction at a distribution warehouse in North Carolina.  Insurer denied coverage.  Recovered a significant sum from the denying insurer.

Represented insured general contractor in connection with alleged construction defects arising at a $20 million distribution warehouse in Oregon. Dispute involved general liability carrier for general contractor and general liability carrier for numerous subcontractors. Assisted general contractor in settling claim and recovering a significant portion of the claim from general liability and E&O carriers. 

The insurance claims at issue involved a construction dispute at a warehouse distribution facility in Texas involving general liability carrier for general contractor and general liability carrier for numerous subcontractors.  The claims at issue exceeded $4 million.  The case involved multiple motions for summary judgment and one appeal [by an insurer to a motion granted to the policyholder].  Represented general contractor in settling claim following ...

Represented general contractor in connection with alleged defective construction at a manufacturing plant in Alabama.   Dispute involved claims in excess of $5 million that resulted in litigation with subcontractors and their general liability insurers as well as dispute with general contractor’s general liability insurer.  The case was settled on favorable terms with general contractor making no contribution toward settlement.